Seismic Expression of Tectonic Features in the Lesser
Sunda Islands, Indonesia
Herman Darman
Introduction
The Sunda Arc is a chain of
islands in the southern part of Indonesia ,
cored by active volcanoes (Fig. 1). The western part of the Sunda arc is dominated
by the large islands of Sumatra and Java, and is commonly called ‘the Greater Sunda Islands ’. The tectonics in this part is
dominated by the oceanic subduction below the Asian continental plate. Towards
the east the islands are much smaller and are called ‘the Lesser
Sunda Islands ’. The transition from oceanic subduction to
continent-island arc collision developed in this area.
The Sunda Arc has long been
considered as a classical accretionary margin system where the Indo-Australian
oceanic plate is underthrust beneath the Asian continent, active since the Late
Oligocene (Hamilton ,
1979). At the eastern end of the Sunda Arc the convergent system changes from
oceanic subduction to continent-island arc collision of the Scott Plateau ,
part of the Australian continent, colliding with the Banda island arc and Sumba Island
in between.
Figure 1. Map of Southeast Asia showing
the different crustal type in the region and the location map of the
|
The Lesser Sunda Islands are also called the inner-arc
islands. The formation of these islands are related to the subduction along the
Java Trench Bali Island is located in the west of the Lesser Sunda Islands and
Alor Island at the east end (Fig. 1). To the south of the inner-arc islands, an
accretionary wedge formed the outer-arc ridge. The ridge is subaerially exposed
in the east as Savu and Timor
Island . The northwest of
the Lesser Sunda Islands are underlain by a
Late Cretaceous Accretionary Crust, which changes to an oceanic crust in the
northeast (Doust & Lijmbach, 1997). The Sumba Island
has a unique orientation and the origin of the island is still debated (Rutherford et al., 2001).
The aim of this article is to
provide a broad overview about the structures of the tectonic units based on
some selected seismic lines. These lines also give a better geological
understanding, including recent processes that developed in the area.
Seismic data
A number of
surveys have been deployed to acquire seismic data in this area. Selected seismic
data used for this article were acquired in the following expeditions:
- R. V. Vema
cruise 28 and R. V. Robert Conrad cruise 11 (in Hamilton , 1979)
- Rama 12
expedition (Prasetyo, 1992; Scripps Institute of Oceanography, http://www.ig.utexas.edu/sdc/)
- R. V. Baruna
Jaya late 90’s (Krabbenhoeft, A., 2010) for bathymetric data acquisition.
- R. V. Sonne, cruise SO190 (Lüschen
et al, 2011)
- CGG
Veritas Spec. Survey (Rigg & Hall, 2012)
-
ION-GXT JavaSPAN 2008 (Granath et al, 2011)
Apart from the
surveys mentioned above, there are other surveys which contributed significant
pieces of information to help geoscientists in understanding the geology of the
region. During the Snellius-2 Expedition, for example, Van Weering et al., (1989)
have also acquired a number of seismic sections in the area, but later surveys
have gathered improved seismic images. Prasetyo (1992) reported seismic
reflection and gravity data from this area as well.
The
earlier surveys, such as R. V. Vema and R. V. Robert Conrad in Hamilton (1979) provided limited data mainly
confined to information on bathymetry and shallow depth of image. The later
images, acquired by CGG Veritas are considered as a modern industry standard for
seismic, providing seismic images down to 8 seconds Two-Way-Time. Recent long
cable with improved technology by ION helped to acquire seismic more than 10 km
deep. These ION deeper sections help geoscientists to acquire a better
understanding about the basement.
Tectonic features
The Lesser Sunda Islands area consists of several tectonic
units (Fig. 2). Several regional seismic sections were shot across these features.
Some lines give a better geological understanding about the composition and the
tectonic processes.
Figure 2. Structural map of the
|
1. Outer-arc Ridge
The
outer-arc ridge or also called the fore-arc ridge is an accretionary wedge
formed by the subduction of the Indian plate. In the west of the Lesser Sunda
Island region, the Outer Arc Ridge formed about 3000 m below sea level,
parallel to the Inner Arc. To the east, the outer-arc ridge exposed sub
aerially as the outer-arc islands of Roti and Timor .
(Fig. 2).These islands are mainly composed of raised shallow and deep marine
sediments. Mud diapers and mud volcanoes are common in the outer-arc islands
(Hamilton, 1979; Zaim, 2012). The outer arc is bounded by the Java Trench which
marked the subduction point in the south. The northern margin of the Outer Arc
Ridge is partly covered by the fore-arc basin sediment fill.
Figure
3 shows regional seismic sections acquired by the Sonne cruise in the region.
Section - A, B, C and D in this figure (from Lüschen et al, 2011) show similar
patterns of the outer-arc ridge. The subduction zone after the trench and the
accretionary complex are well imaged. Lüschen (2011), also provide detail
seismic images of Section B in Figure 4, showing the structures of the
outer-arc ridge. The outer-arc ridge is a structurally complex unit with a
series of thrust faults (Fig. 4A and further detail in Fig 4B). Some of these faults generated topographical
relief on top of the outer-arc ridge and formed ‘piggy-back basins’, which are
filled with recent sediments from surrounding structural highs. On seismic
these sediments appear as brighter and relatively flat reflectors all the way
up to the surface (Fig. 4C).
Section
E and F in the east of the area show different patterns compared to the western
4 sections. The outer-arc ridge in Figure 3E has a
gentle relief and the thrust faults are not as clear as the sections in the
west. Figure 3F also shows a gentle relief but much wider (reformulate). The difference
between the four seismic profiles in the west and the two in the east, reflect
the transition from oceanic subduction to continent in the west to
continent-island arc collision in the east (Kopp, 2011).
2. Fore-arc Basin .
Depressions
in the seabed between the inner volcanic arc and the outer-arc are known as
fore-arc basins. The fore-arc basin in the west is called the Lombok Basin
and the water depth of this basin is about 4000 to 5000 m deep (Fig. 2). Savu Basin
is the fore-arc basin located in the east of the Lesser Sunda Islands,
separated from the Lombok basin by Sumba
Island . In parts the
water depth of Savu
Basin is deeper than 2000
m.
A
series of north dipping thrust faults are clearly seen in the close up of these
seismic sections as shown in Figure 4. A closer detail display of fault system
in the trench is shown in Figure 4. A small sediment accommodation space
developed in the trench. Recent sediments have filled this small depocentre,
indicated by flat sea bottom on seismic sections.
Lüschen et al, 2011, also indicated
a Piggy-Back Basin developed in the centre of the
Outer Arc Ridge by the thrust fault system. These basins are generally small
and filled with recent sediments. Similar to the trench deposit, these basins
are characterized by semi parallel reflectors with flat surfaces (Fig.4).
The Savu
fore-arc basin developed in the east of the Lesser Sunda
islands , where there is now a change from oceanic subduction to
arc-continent collision (Rigg and Hall, 2012). The Savu
Basin is bounded to the west by the island of Sumba and by a submarine ridge (the
Sumba Ridge) that crosses the fore-arc obliquely in an NW-SE direction. The
basin is narrowing to the east. To volcanic island arc bounded the north part
of the basin (Fig. 1).
Figure5A
and 5B shows 2 regional seismic sections across the Savu Basin ,
acquired during Rama expedition in early 1980’s. The section on the west (Fig. 5A)
shows the narrow part of the basin, with the southern flank of the volcanic arc
(Flores Island )
in the north and the east continuation of the Sumba Island
high in the south. A detail section of the southern margin of the basin is
shown in Fig. 5C with seismo-stratigraphic interpretation (Fig 5 D) by Rigg and
Hall (2012). At the south end of this section Unit 1 is uplifted and thrust
northwards towards the basin and Units 2, 3 and 4 are largely missing and
interpreted to have been redeposited in the basin as Unit 4. Figure 5D shows a
significant southward thinning of Unit 3 and 4. Steep dipping of the base of
Unit2 are probably controlled by faults. Unit 3 contain a brighter reflective
package which wedges out to the north. A rather transparent seismic package
developed in the north part of the unit. The top of Unit 4 is relatively
undisturbed in the distal part.
3. Inner Arc –
Volcanic
The
Inner volcanic arc islands are some of the simplest geological structures
within this complex region, and are certainly simpler than the outer-arc
islands. The islands arc is basically a chain of young oceanic volcanic
islands, often ringed by reef limestones or by other sedimentary material that
has eroded from the main body of the island and built up between the tongues of
lava and other extrusions. In general, the origins or basal materials of these
islands become progressively younger from west to east, following the evolution
of the Banda Arc eastward from the Sumba Fracture (Monk et al, 1997).
Figure
6 shows a seismic section acquired between Bali and Lombok island by Robert
Conrad cruise 11 (Hamilton ,
1979). The volcanic ridge is made irregular by volcanoes, fault blocks, and
folds which affect the sedimentary cover (Fig. 6). The southern flank of the
volcanic ridge is rich of volcanic deposits. A smaller sea bottom high in the
north is probably formed by volcanic intrusion (Fig. 7).
4. Continental shelf edge
The
Australian Continental Shelf is located in the southeast of the Lesser-Sunda Islands . The edge of this continent is interpreted
to be in the north side of Sumba and Timor
Island (Fig. 1, after
Harris et al, 2009). Unfortunately the seismic images acquire in these area are
either to shallow or too poor to see the edge of the edge of the Australian
Continent Shelf.
The
Sunda Shelf is located in the northwest of the studied area. A deep seismic
section acquired by ION (Fig. 8) helped to understand the margin of the Sunda
Shelf. Granath et al (2011) have interpreted the top basement based on this
seismic image. The shallow basement in the WNW beneath NSA-1F well (Fig. 8A)
and Kangean West-2 (Fig. 8B) is interpreted as the Sunda Shelf. The deeper basement in the ESE has been
interpreted as Late Cretaceous accretionary crust (Doust & Lymbach, 1997). Hamilton , 1979,
identifies this area as Tertiary oceanic and arc crust.
Figure 9. Detail sections of the
profiles shown in Figure 8. A) located near to NSA-1F and B) located near to
Kangean West-2 well.
|
5. Flores Basin
A
west-east trend normal fault, which is dipping to the south, developed in the
north of the Lesser Sunda Islands and formed Flores Basin .
The map in figure 1 shows that the water depth in this basin reaches about more
than 4000 meters. A seismic section acquired by R. V. Robert Conrad (Fig. 10,
Hamilton, 1979) shows a deep trench developed by the fault. Recent sediment
accumulation is well imaged in this section at about 6.5 seconds. The Flores Basin
is poorly understood as it is deep and covered only by sparse data.
Prasetyo
(1992) published a number of seismic lines which cover Flores Basin
and discussed the Flores Thrust Zone in great detail. The thrust zone is a
prominent E-W oriented structural feature extending from east to the west of
the Flores Basin . The fault zone separated south
dipping sedimentary sequences, including Paleocene rift and related sediments,
from the complex deformed material to the south (Prasetyo, 1992)
6. Sumba Island
The position of
the Sumba Island is unique. It is not part of the
Sunda arc, which formed a lineation of volcanic islands in the north of Sumba . From the position it may be more related to Timor but it has different orientation (Fig. 1 and 2).
The origin of the island is still a debate amongst worker on this area.
The Sumba Island
is generally recognized as an exposed fore-arc basement which is located
between the Inner and Outer Arc. Several workers have considered Sumba Island
as a micro continent within a region of arc-continent collision
(Audley-Charles, 1975; Hamilton, 1979), and more recently as accreted terrane
(Nur and Ben-Avram, 1982; Howell et al., 1983). De Werff et al (1994) and
Harris et al (2009) conclude that the Sumba
Island is a continuation of Timor which is an arc-continent collision zone.
Tectonic activities
The
Sunda Arc is known as an active convergence zone producing earthquakes,
tsunamis and volcanic hazards. The Indo-Australian plate currently moves at 6.7
cm/a in a direction N11oE off western Java and thus almost normal to
the trench (Tregoning et al. 1994). Convergence speed slightly increases from
western Java towards the east at a very subtle rate. The movement is reaching 7
cm/a of Bali (Simons et al, 2007) and has been
active since Eocene (Hall & Smyth, 2008). The overriding plate is
continental including Sumatra and western Java (Kopp et al, 2001) and the
basement below the forearc basin offshore Bali and Lombok is probably a rifted
crust of a continental character in transition to oceanic character at Sumbawa and further east (Banda Sea, Van der Weff, 1996).
The
locations of the earthquake epicenters in the centre part of the Lesser Sunda
Island reflect the subduction of the Australian Lithosphere under the Asian
continenet (Fig. 11) . The Australian lithosphere, which is interpreted as
Precambrian continental crust (Hamilton ,
1979) moves northward. This subduction angle is also getting steeper
northwards.
Figure 11. This plot shows the
earthquake localizations on a South-North cross section for the lat -14°/-4°
long 114°/124° quadrant corresponding to the
data
source: USGS-NEIC; displayed in http://bigideasroots.wordpress.com/6-1/
|
Discussion
Two major
tectonic discontinuities separate the Banda Arc from the Sunda Arc in this
area. The Pantar Fracture extends approximately north-south between the island of Pantar
and Alor, and the Sumba Fracture separates Sumba and Flores islands from Sumbawa (Nishimura and Suparka, 1986). Unfortunately the
discontinuity of the arc, or the transition from Sunda to Banda arc is not
clearly seen on seismic section. Nishimura and Suparka (1986) use ‘fracture’ to
describe the separation, which indicates a small offset and therefore may not be imaged
well on seismic sections, especially by older sections
All seismic
sections included in this are article were acquired sparsely offshore.
Additional data around Sumba
Island may improve the
understanding of the origin of the island. This may bring the debate of the
origin of the island closer to conclusion.
Closing Remarks
The Lesser Sunda Islands are a very active tectonic region,
formed by the subduction of the Indian Oceanic plate in the west and a
continent-island arc collision in the east.
This
area is located between the Eurasian Continental Crust or also known as Sunda
Shelf and the Australian Continental Crust or Scott Plateau .
The geology in the north of the Lesser Sunda Islands
is poorly understood as it is poorly covered by seismic and lack of well
penetration.
The
west part of the Lesser Sunda Island is generally less complex compared to the
east. The transition from Sunda arc to Banda arc, with Sumba and Timor Island
in the east make the geology more complicated.
References
Doust, H., & Lijmbach, G., 1997, Charge
constraints on the hydrocarbon habitat and development of hydrocarbons systems
in Southeast Asia Tertiary Basins, in Proceedings of the Petroleum Systems of
SE Asia and Australasia Conference, Indonesian Petroleum Association.
Granath, J. W., Christ, J. M., Emmet, P. A., &
Dinkelman, M. G., 2011, Pre-Cenozoic sedimentary section and structure as
reflected in the JavaSPANTM crustal-scale PSDM seismic survey, and its
implications regarding the basement terranes in the East Java Sea in: Hall, R.,
Cottam, M. A. &Wilson, M. E. J. (eds) The SE Asian Gateway: History and
Tectonics of the Australia–Asia Collision. Geological Society, London , Special Publications, 355, 53–74.
Hutchison, C., 1989, Geological Evolution of
South-East Asia, Oxford
University Press.
Krabbenhoeft, A., Weinrebe, R. W., Kopp, H., Flueh,
E. R., Ladage, S., Papenberg, C., Planert, L., and Djajadihardja, Y., 2010,
Bathymetry of the Indonesian Sunda margin-relating morphological features of
the upper plate slopes to the location and extent of the seimogenic zone, Nat.
Hazards Earth Syste. Sci., 10, p. 1899-1911.
Lüschen,
E., Müller, C., Kopp, H., Engels, M., Lutz, R., Planert, L., Shulgin, A.,
Djajadihardja, Y. S., 2011, Structure, evolution and tectonic activity of the
eastern Sunda forearc,Indonesia from marine seismic investigations,
Tectonophysics, 508, p. 6-21
Monk, A.,
de Fretes, Y., Lilley, G. R., 1997, The ecology of Nusa Tenggara & Maluku,
Periplus Edition.
Nishimura, S. and Suparka, S., 1986, Tectonic
development of east Indonesia ,
Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences 1, 45-47.
Prasetyo, H., 1992, The Bali-Flores Basin: Geological
transition from extensional to subsequent compressional deformation,
Proceedings of Indonesian Petroleum Association, 21th Annual Convention
Rigg, J. W. D. & Hall, R., 2012, Neogene
development of the Savu Forearc Basin, Indonesia, Marine and Petroleum Geology
32, p. 76-94
Simons, W. J. F., Socquet, A., et al., 2007, A decade
of GPS in Southeast Asia : resolving Sundaland
motion and boundaries, Journal of Geophysical Research, 112.
Tregoning, P., Brunner, F. K. Et al., 1994, First
geodetic measurement of convergence across the Java Trench, Geophysical
Research Letters, 21, p. 2135-2138.
Van Weering, T. C. E., Kusnida, D., Tjokrosapoetro,
S., Lubis, S., Kridoharto, P. and Munadi, S. (1989) The seismic structure of
the Lombok and Savu forearc basins, Indonesia Neth. J. Sea, Res. 24, 251-262